If a disabled person lives there, then (in the US) landlords are legally obligated to provide the disabled renter with a habitable living space under the Americans with Disabilities act, which is federal.

It's also worth pointing out, that anywhere in the US, if a person slips and falls on your property you (but mostly your insurance company probably) are responsible. So the landlord is open to additional liability there even if there are no local laws regarding snow removal simply because they are the owner of the property.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Great point in that first paragraph. In the second paragraph, it's my understanding that you can't sue if there was no expectation of safety. If the path isn't cleared in the slightest, then you're not liable. I also know that in some areas the owner can just write into the lease "you guys have to clear the snow" and it becomes the tenant's responsibility.

Anyway, fucking, clear your sidewalks people, be nice.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

You can sue for literally any reason you like in the US. Doesn't guarantee success of course and you might even end up being liable for court costs in addition to your own lawyer (if you hire one) but even if the lawsuit fails, being sued is a pain in the ass to begin with so why even open up the opportunity? Just shovel the damn snow or hire someone to take care of it especially if you are renting to disabled people.

Slumlords will downvote but fuck those assholes.