this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
137 points (96.6% liked)

Games

18674 readers
202 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Demonstrating some crazy idea always confuses people who expect a finished product. The fact this works at all is sci-fi witchcraft.

Video generators offer rendering without models, levels, textures, shaders-- anything. And they'll do shocking photorealism as easily as cartoons. This one runs at interactive speeds. That's fucking crazy! It's only doing one part of one game that'd run on a potato, and it's not doing it especially well, but holy shit, it's doing it. Even if the context length stayed laughably short - this is an FMV you can walk around in. This is something artists could feed and prune and get real fuckin' weird with, until it's an inescapable dream sequence that looks like nothing we know how to render.

The most realistic near-term application of generative AI technology remains as coding assistants and perhaps rapid prototyping tools for developers, rather than a drop-in replacement for traditional game development pipelines.

Sure, let's pretend text is all it can generate. Not textures, models, character designs, et very cetera. What possible use could people have for an army of robots if they only do a half-assed job?

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Imagine how much better bg3 would have been if there were more randomly distributed misc items of no value strewn across each map. Think of how fast you'd kill your mouse then!

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

This is what I'm talking about: an unwillingness to see anything but finished products. Not developing the content in a big-ass game... just adding stuff to a big-ass game. Like BG3 begins fully-formed as the exact product you've already played.

Like it'd be awful if similar new games took less than six years, three hundred people, and one hundred million dollars.