this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
299 points (95.2% liked)

Games

37902 readers
1043 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You think they're going to sell repackaged SNES and N64 games for less than that?(Edit: incorrect, they are in fact less than $80) How bout switch 1 games? Those are "modern" so significantly cheaper, still legal to have a backup, still legal to emulate....and will be run in an emulator on the switch 2, no native backwards compatibility.
As for switch 2 games....just waiting for a while getting them 2nd hand means they'll be cheaper, if you can actually get a hardcopy, and all the things I just said still apply....

[–] missingno@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They do not sell SNES and N64 games for $80, no. You know those are on the NSO app already, right?

Look, if you wanna be mad that Mario Kart World is $80, that's fair to be mad at. But you don't gotta make up misinformation.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wasn't intentionally spreading misinformation. Classic games, as you said, are cheaper. However switch 1 games are still $80. And my point about legally being able to emulate them stands.
I'll retract my statements on the cost of legacy games here and go back through my previous comments and change them to reflect this.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] missingno@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's CAD, the article in the OP was about USD.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] missingno@fedia.io 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can't tell if you were intentionally trying to mislead, but you know that this discourse was never about CAD, right? You know that the article is discussing USD, right?

It's not nitpicking to say that you've been misleading, whether intentionally or not.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Fair enough. Not doing it intentionally. Just a dumbfuck 🤷