this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
223 points (99.6% liked)

Games

37902 readers
733 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think the big problem is when companies apply for patents but never utilize them. In my ideal world, patents should quickly expire and opened to the public if they aren’t being used. Like, what’s the point of protecting your idea if you have no intention to use it anytime soon?

That could deal with the patent troll problem as well.

[–] Blinsane@reddthat.com 2 points 6 days ago

What the point is? To cripple your competition. Nintendo is actively discouraging game development. If Nintendo was a human they would be garbage. Since they're not human, everyone who choose to work for them is garbage.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah I'm not against patents in general because it's meant to allow the company or individual a chance to be only one on the market so they can recoup rnd costs instead of someone else coming in and undercutting them immediately.

The issue is they last too long. Especially idea ones like this for software. 5 years is what it should be around about.

[–] charles@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

I'd even be okay with patents lasting more than 5 years as long as the patented concept is being actively utilized. Essentially, use it or lose it.