this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
289 points (99.0% liked)

Linux

53416 readers
607 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

One of the strongest points of Linux is the package management. In 2025, the world of Linux package management is very varied, with several options available, each with their advantages and trade-offs over the others.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Shame they didn't mention that homebrew is a security nightmare and will happily download maliciously modified code

Edit: omg then the author claims flatpak is better for security?!? It has the same nightmare security issues.

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Shame they didn't mention that homebrew is a security nightmare and will happily download maliciously modified code

That's so true, I was missing this part! With homebrew you're at the mercy of whoever put the package out there, much like with installers (and nix to be fair)

Edit: omg then the author claims flatpak is better for security?!? It has the same nightmare security issues.

LMAO no‽ Flatpaks can be verified, and you can choose not to install unverified flatpaks (which you should!) They are also containerised pretty well by default, in case they're malicious!

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Flatpaks can be verified. Compare that to apt packaged, which must be cryptographically signed.

That's why flatpak isnt secure. If you use it, you might end up running malicious code. Because, unlike most Linux repo package managers, it doesn't require packages to be cryptographically verified as authentic.

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I get that it's less secure, but using verified flatpaks beats homebrew by a large margin.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Using apt, yum, dnf, pacman etc beats flatpak by magnitudes

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 1 points 6 hours ago

True, but saying Brew is unsafe but Flatpak isn't, isn't too odd, either.