this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
72 points (98.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

60204 readers
916 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nintendo is hoping to wrap up its lawsuit against gamer Jesse Keighin, aka EveryGameGuru, after he failed to answer the complaint. The game giant seeks $17,500 in damages for copyright infringement, including streaming pre-release games and sharing links to emulators. In addition, Nintendo requests a broad global injunction to prevent future infringements, even for games that do not yet exist.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

So what's the crime here? Publishing something Ninty didn't want to get out yet?

Theoretically any streamer could get sued for copyright infringement by the copyright holders. This is because they own the gameplay, irrespective of whether someone plays it themselves or watches someone else play it. That's why Nintendo sues for copyright infringement. Usually game companies understand streamers correctly as free advertisement (sometimes even paid) and don't sue.

Edit: I can imagine they look at broadcasting playing their game in a similar way to someone reading a book out loud publicly. Which is also copyright infringement.

I agree with you on most of your points. And just wanted to clarify this.

[–] mbirth@lemmy.ml 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

This is because they own the gameplay

Do they, though? They create the world, but the player is the one controlling the action.

someone reading a book out loud publicly

If I publicly read a book, I replay the contents verbatim. Basically an exact copy. But playing a game IMHO is more like fan-fiction. I'm making my own story and thus there should be no way to get any legal case against showing/publishing this to others.

That being said, if you monetise your videos and make money from them, it becomes a whole different story.

[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 7 hours ago

They create the world, but the player is the one controlling the action.

Yes, the streamer adds to the experience (i.e. how he plays, commentary, ...), but a narrator put their own spin on a story. Intonation, the timing of pauses, etc. all requires skill and changes the end result.

Good point about fan fictions. I think fan fics are more like mods in the way that they expand on the world/media without distributing the original media itself.

But yeah I also think it's dumb that playing a video game could be considered copyright infringement. The same goes for small clips from movies, which are the exact opposite of detrimental to the popularity of a movie.