this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
30 points (96.9% liked)
Games
16830 readers
773 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
And yet they will. I'm 100% confident that the advise for control 2 will "okay you want to play Control first obviously, but also the control DLCs are important, which includes AWE, so now you're gonna want to pick up Alan 2, and to really get that you're gonna want to play the first game and the dlcs including the standalone not included in the remaster and also max payne and the alan 2 dlcs"
I love remedy games, but they can not stop themselves from interlinking everything. Everything is important, everything from every game.
AWE is decent DLC.
It's nowhere near critical to enjoy Alan Wake. Neither is Control in its entirety.
And I think playing Alan Wake 2 first and then Control, would be just as cool because unlike other interlinked things, they are separate stories with references in both directions.
Which games you play or in what order, doesn't matter.
I believe their point is that it's not necessary to play Alan Wake to enjoy Control, or vice versa.