Not The Onion

17392 readers

970 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

397

Texas Democrats Help Pass Bill Letting Fetuses Count for the HOV Lane (www.jezebel.com)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by sundray@lemmus.org to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

83 comments fedilink hide all child comments

🤦

Republican lawmakers in Texas have once again introduced a bill that tries to shove fetal personhood into carpool lane regulations. This time, however, the bill passed the House after an amendment from Democrats to include all mothers, whether their children are in the car or not. The dangerous proposal that could further entrench the idea of personhood into state law now goes to the Senate for consideration.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 138 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

This isn't just a horrifically-misleading headline, it's straight-up false.

The bill originally was written to directly establish personhood of a fetus, but Democrats got an amendment in that keeps the "pregnant mothers get to use the carpool lane" part, without the language that establishes personhood for a fetus. They literally called the Republicans' bluff on "this bill is about supporting mothers", by making that specific. This caused one Republican to retract his vote, because the amendment "guts the pro-life purpose of the bill".

[–] MerrySkeptic@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Don't you know people who use the Internet can't be bothered to read the article!

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Some of us are completely illiterate!

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I don't know what you said, but I like the way you said it.

[–] reiterationstation@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago

I might believe democrats are playing 4d chess if they ever accomplished anything that didn’t get used against them.

[–] Goretantath@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How do cops determine if a woman is pregnant or beer bellied though? They make em pee on a stick they carry with the breathalyzer?

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

The pregnancy registry of course.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 6 points 2 months ago

It's still a stupid waste of everyone's time.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Thank you for putting my mind at ease after reading the heinously misleading title of the OP.