Not The Onion

17028 readers

1058 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

397

Texas Democrats Help Pass Bill Letting Fetuses Count for the HOV Lane (www.jezebel.com)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by sundray@lemmus.org to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

83 comments fedilink hide all child comments

🤦

Republican lawmakers in Texas have once again introduced a bill that tries to shove fetal personhood into carpool lane regulations. This time, however, the bill passed the House after an amendment from Democrats to include all mothers, whether their children are in the car or not. The dangerous proposal that could further entrench the idea of personhood into state law now goes to the Senate for consideration.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 138 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

This isn't just a horrifically-misleading headline, it's straight-up false.

The bill originally was written to directly establish personhood of a fetus, but Democrats got an amendment in that keeps the "pregnant mothers get to use the carpool lane" part, without the language that establishes personhood for a fetus. They literally called the Republicans' bluff on "this bill is about supporting mothers", by making that specific. This caused one Republican to retract his vote, because the amendment "guts the pro-life purpose of the bill".

[–] MerrySkeptic@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Don't you know people who use the Internet can't be bothered to read the article!

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Some of us are completely illiterate!

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I don't know what you said, but I like the way you said it.

[–] reiterationstation@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago

I might believe democrats are playing 4d chess if they ever accomplished anything that didn’t get used against them.

[–] Goretantath@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How do cops determine if a woman is pregnant or beer bellied though? They make em pee on a stick they carry with the breathalyzer?

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

The pregnancy registry of course.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 6 points 1 month ago

It's still a stupid waste of everyone's time.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Thank you for putting my mind at ease after reading the heinously misleading title of the OP.