this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
141 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

16295 readers
669 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/64140227

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org -3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

wait what did you mean by "We were afraid of mind reading tech when we should have been afraid of polygraph 2.0" then

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It doesn’t read your mind. It gives output, that’s not the same thing as mind reading any more than the polygraph was lie detection. The real threat was and always has been cops and the state.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org -3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

when were we afraid of it besides being afraid of it for being polygraph 2.0

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 week ago

I was talking about the historical presence in sci fi and pop culture of fear of mind reading machines in general, as opposed to this specific one. But I mean, do you think cities are spending tens of thousands of dollars because they don’t think it works like that? They at least believe they can convince people that it reads minds.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

People really just got annoyed about you missing the context of a comment (science fiction and cultural depictions of the future) and asking clarifying questions until you got it.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 6 days ago

time to get annoyed about somebody’s addiction to idioms!

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

science fictiun has been warning about a surveillance state that becomes so pervasive it penetrates your thoughts for decades. but we never really wrote any speculative fiction about the state planting evidence of thoughts on you