There are plenty of more genuine resolutions you could've picked, but they wouldn't have fit your narrative as well. Please don't launder Russia's lies just to embellish your point.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 18 points 5 months ago (14 children)

"If Russia says Nazis are bad, than Nazis must be good!"

Liberal politics is just reaction.

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago (5 children)

I said the resolution is bad, not the principle. You're again misrepresenting something to further your own narrative.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 months ago (4 children)

So the content is the resolution is good, but its nonetheless contacted some kind of metaphysical badness unrelated to it's content due to it being proposed by a bad guy and not a good guy.

Maybe we can get it proposed by Israel instead, then it would be a good guy presenting it because they only invade non-white countries

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

“If Russia says combating the glorification of Nazis are bad, they might be using too many modifiers.”

fyp

load more comments (12 replies)

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I'm guessing, based purely on the countries highlighted, that this is a Russian sponsored resolution.

Pretty funny how you saw that all of Latin America, Africa, and Asia voted against genocide, and your first reaction is to call them russian bots.

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago

More that Ukraine voted against it and every single Western country abstained. Was I wrong though?

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 months ago

We can't condemn the Nazis because if we condemn the Nazis people will think we're Nazis. When people see that we won't condemn the Nazis, that's how they'll know we aren't Nazis.

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 10 points 5 months ago (8 children)

This is a weak ass excuse collaborator. You get the pit too.

load more comments (8 replies)

[–] Manticore@lemmy.nz 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I think its more likely that the abstaining countries rely on America for trade or military in some way and don't want to aggravate them politically but clearly aren't willing to vote alongside them.

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Or, as the other (better informed) guy said. This resolution equates tearing down soviet monuments to be Nazism.

That by extension means it equates Ukraine (the country partially occupied and fraudulently annexed by Russia) with Nazism. Countries which respect Ukraine's sovereignty (and have enough skepticism of Russia to read more than the title) wouldn't want to vote against (because of the title) but also wouldn't want to vote in favor.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago (8 children)

Tearing down monuments to WW2 veterans who fought against the Nazis certainly suggests a certain affinity with the Nazis.

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't. The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend. Monuments that glorify Soviets might be torn down for a plethora of reasons that don't have anything to do with nazism and have a lot to do with Soviet atrocities.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm comfortable to say people tearing down memorials to the soldiers who faught against the Nazis to replace them with memorials to the people who fought for the Nazis makes you a Nazi.

Feddit continuing not to beat the charges.

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 0 points 5 months ago (11 children)

Keep spreading Russian propaganda if it makes you happy. Still doesn't mean you're right.

load more comments (11 replies)

load more comments (7 replies)

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago

Lol stay stupid patriot

[–] bob_lemon@feddit.org 3 points 5 months ago

You would be correct: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1654458?ln=en&v=pdf

At the 44th meeting, on 6 November, the representative of the Russian
Federation, on behalf of Algeria, Armenia, Bangladesh, Belarus, Bolivia
(Plurinational State of), Burundi, China, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea,
Eritrea, Kazakhstan, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Mali, Myanmar,
Nicaragua, the Niger, Nigeria, Pakistan, the Russian Federation, the Sudan, the Syrian
Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Viet Nam
and Zimbabwe, introduced a draft resolution [...]

At the [48th] meeting, the representative of the Russian Federation made a statement.

Also at the same meeting, statements were made by the representatives of Kyrgyzstan (on behalf of the Collective Security Treaty Organization, composed of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, the Russian Federation, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan), Belarus, the Russian Federation and South Africa.

[–] skarn@lemmy.today 0 points 5 months ago

Note that Crimea is not counted as Ukrainian in this map. Makes you wonder.