this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
321 points (76.8% liked)

Memes

50421 readers
750 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 37 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (8 children)

I'm guessing, based purely on the countries highlighted, that this is a Russian sponsored resolution.

There are plenty of more genuine resolutions you could've picked, but they wouldn't have fit your narrative as well. Please don't launder Russia's lies just to embellish your point.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 15 points 4 days ago (14 children)

"If Russia says Nazis are bad, than Nazis must be good!"

Liberal politics is just reaction.

[–] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

“If Russia says combating the glorification of Nazis are bad, they might be using too many modifiers.”

fyp

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I said the resolution is bad, not the principle. You're again misrepresenting something to further your own narrative.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 days ago (4 children)

So the content is the resolution is good, but its nonetheless contacted some kind of metaphysical badness unrelated to it's content due to it being proposed by a bad guy and not a good guy.

Maybe we can get it proposed by Israel instead, then it would be a good guy presenting it because they only invade non-white countries

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I'm guessing, based purely on the countries highlighted, that this is a Russian sponsored resolution.

Pretty funny how you saw that all of Latin America, Africa, and Asia voted against genocide, and your first reaction is to call them russian bots.

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 days ago

More that Ukraine voted against it and every single Western country abstained. Was I wrong though?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 days ago

We can't condemn the Nazis because if we condemn the Nazis people will think we're Nazis. When people see that we won't condemn the Nazis, that's how they'll know we aren't Nazis.

[–] bob_lemon@feddit.org 3 points 3 days ago

You would be correct: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1654458?ln=en&v=pdf

At the 44th meeting, on 6 November, the representative of the Russian
Federation, on behalf of Algeria, Armenia, Bangladesh, Belarus, Bolivia
(Plurinational State of), Burundi, China, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea,
Eritrea, Kazakhstan, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Mali, Myanmar,
Nicaragua, the Niger, Nigeria, Pakistan, the Russian Federation, the Sudan, the Syrian
Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Viet Nam
and Zimbabwe, introduced a draft resolution [...]

At the [48th] meeting, the representative of the Russian Federation made a statement.

Also at the same meeting, statements were made by the representatives of Kyrgyzstan (on behalf of the Collective Security Treaty Organization, composed of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, the Russian Federation, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan), Belarus, the Russian Federation and South Africa.

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 9 points 4 days ago (8 children)

This is a weak ass excuse collaborator. You get the pit too.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Manticore@lemmy.nz 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I think its more likely that the abstaining countries rely on America for trade or military in some way and don't want to aggravate them politically but clearly aren't willing to vote alongside them.

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Or, as the other (better informed) guy said. This resolution equates tearing down soviet monuments to be Nazism.

That by extension means it equates Ukraine (the country partially occupied and fraudulently annexed by Russia) with Nazism. Countries which respect Ukraine's sovereignty (and have enough skepticism of Russia to read more than the title) wouldn't want to vote against (because of the title) but also wouldn't want to vote in favor.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago (15 children)

Tearing down monuments to WW2 veterans who fought against the Nazis certainly suggests a certain affinity with the Nazis.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago

Lol stay stupid patriot

load more comments (1 replies)