this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
286 points (97.7% liked)

Greentext

6270 readers
1574 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chatroom@lemm.ee 87 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Short distance to subject and wide angle camera lens makes bad photos

[–] jwt@programming.dev 11 points 13 hours ago

Yes, I think focal length and lighting are the main culprits:

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every cellphone camera is objectively terrible at capturing human features

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

Helps if you angle the camera down slightly, actually funny story about AI... There was this site a few years ago that would give you a masculine/femanine score based on a selfie, I discovered all it was really checking was the angle of the face because men tend to take photos straight on and women know to take the photo with your face at an angle. (But NEVER an upward angle)

[–] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

In addition to this (the effects of which are far more pronounced than the 'mirror image' theory btw — flipping a camera shot doesn't tend to make a strong difference after all), a photo is just, well, a snapshot. It can't pick up the subtle movements in expressions that add to your visual personality. If we all went about with a static photo expression on our faces, we'd look weird as fuck.

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

You said it better than me.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz -2 points 1 day ago

Not necessarily