AI Generated Images
Community for AI image generation. Any models are allowed. Creativity is valuable! It is recommended to post the model used for reference, but not a rule.
No explicit violence, gore, or nudity.
This is not a NSFW community although exceptions are sometimes made. Any NSFW posts must be marked as NSFW and may be removed at any moderator's discretion. Any suggestive imagery may be removed at any time.
Refer to https://lemmynsfw.com/ for any NSFW imagery.
No misconduct: Harassment, Abuse or assault, Bullying, Illegal activity, Discrimination, Racism, Trolling, Bigotry.
AI Generated Videos are allowed under the same rules. Photosensitivity warning required for any flashing videos.
To embed images type:
“”
Follow all sh.itjust.works rules.
Community Challenge Past Entries
Related communities:
- !auai@programming.dev
Useful general AI discussion - !aiphotography@lemmings.world
Photo-realistic AI images - !stable_diffusion_art@lemmy.dbzer0.com Stable Diffusion Art
- !share_anime_art@lemmy.dbzer0.com Stable Diffusion Anime Art
- !botart@lemmy.dbzer0.com AI art generated through bots
- !degenerate@lemmynsfw.com
NSFW weird and surreal images - !aigen@lemmynsfw.com
NSFW AI generated porn
view the rest of the comments
That's great for academic writings and whatnot, that distinction, but as the common populace's understanding of private property includes both what you would call private property and personal property, maybe, to avoid misleading people or having them reject your cause as something seeming more extreme than it is, say something like 'abolish corporate property' to make it unambiguous to all people, even those who haven't read Marx, what you mean?
The whole point of the poster is to show the common populace that there is a difference between the two.
Rather than create a new term and spend time educating the populace on that, I can just use the term that's been in use for far longer than I've been alive and is understood already by millions.
Also "Hippity Hoppity Abolish Private Property" is already a well known meme, I'm adopting it for further reach. Changing the wording would be a negative.
though, that by using the term 'private property', that would be, to the populace, creating a new term and having to educate everyone on what it means. Conversely, the term 'corporate property' that I just made up, without having to be explicitly defined, is immediately obvious in its meaning to everyone already.
Corporate property sounds like the problem is corporations and not ownership imo.
Either way I'm not going back to change this, it's made, posted, and I've moved on but you're welcome to modify it as you wish.
Wait, the problem you're stating isn't corporate ownership, but ownership in general? Then what's the personal property?
Capitalism is defined by private ownership. Be it corporations or rich individuals, the underlying issue is the ownership.
I am not calling to abolish all concepts of ownership, only what we call 'private property'. I am in favour of personal property.
I might have to agree with that other commenter that maybe new terms are needed just for clarity of communication, at least with those outside the movement.
In my mind, personal property would be a subset of private property so getting rid of the larger set necessarily includes the subset.
So personal property as you're using it presumably has a maximum allowable level? Or just as long as it's for your personal use? No rental houses for example, but a vacation home would be ok?
The toothbrush
Oh, I'm not saying you should change this post, no, of course not!
And I'm also not trying to work at cross purposes with you either, we both want the same thing, I think.
Just noting maybe a better approach that might work, for your and others' reference, that was all.
Private property is like the goal of corporations though. The super highway to end stage capitalism.