this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
92 points (96.0% liked)
AI Generated Images
7794 readers
119 users here now
Community for AI image generation. Any models are allowed. Creativity is valuable! It is recommended to post the model used for reference, but not a rule.
No explicit violence, gore, or nudity.
This is not a NSFW community although exceptions are sometimes made. Any NSFW posts must be marked as NSFW and may be removed at any moderator's discretion. Any suggestive imagery may be removed at any time.
Refer to https://lemmynsfw.com/ for any NSFW imagery.
No misconduct: Harassment, Abuse or assault, Bullying, Illegal activity, Discrimination, Racism, Trolling, Bigotry.
AI Generated Videos are allowed under the same rules. Photosensitivity warning required for any flashing videos.
To embed images type:
“”
Follow all sh.itjust.works rules.
Community Challenge Past Entries
Related communities:
- !auai@programming.dev
Useful general AI discussion - !aiphotography@lemmings.world
Photo-realistic AI images - !stable_diffusion_art@lemmy.dbzer0.com Stable Diffusion Art
- !share_anime_art@lemmy.dbzer0.com Stable Diffusion Anime Art
- !botart@lemmy.dbzer0.com AI art generated through bots
- !degenerate@lemmynsfw.com
NSFW weird and surreal images - !aigen@lemmynsfw.com
NSFW AI generated porn
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The whole point of the poster is to show the common populace that there is a difference between the two.
Rather than create a new term and spend time educating the populace on that, I can just use the term that's been in use for far longer than I've been alive and is understood already by millions.
Also "Hippity Hoppity Abolish Private Property" is already a well known meme, I'm adopting it for further reach. Changing the wording would be a negative.
though, that by using the term 'private property', that would be, to the populace, creating a new term and having to educate everyone on what it means. Conversely, the term 'corporate property' that I just made up, without having to be explicitly defined, is immediately obvious in its meaning to everyone already.
Corporate property sounds like the problem is corporations and not ownership imo.
Either way I'm not going back to change this, it's made, posted, and I've moved on but you're welcome to modify it as you wish.
Oh, I'm not saying you should change this post, no, of course not!
And I'm also not trying to work at cross purposes with you either, we both want the same thing, I think.
Just noting maybe a better approach that might work, for your and others' reference, that was all.