this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
-1 points (49.6% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
62787 readers
465 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
🏴☠️ Other communities
FUCK ADOBE!
Torrenting/P2P:
- !seedboxes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !trackers@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !qbittorrent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !libretorrent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !soulseek@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Gaming:
- !steamdeckpirates@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !newyuzupiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !switchpirates@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !3dspiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !retropirates@lemmy.dbzer0.com
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Excellent work!
Line is however subjective. On my device that's actually 5 lines, because 2 of them wrap. And you didn't count the blank line between your lines 2 and 3. That would make 4 if you had.
But that's just coincidence and post hock nitpicking. Really I assumed you were referring to both of my primary comments together, since you also referenced the second. And calling the short paragraphs lines. Count them that way, there were also 4.
Remember me saying you're arguing semantics? You are now trying to argue that you wrote 4 lines not 3 because of a blank line...
Try nothing. I actually did it! 👨🎓
That is correct. You argued that a blank line counts as part of your original argument... I am playing chess with a pigeon it seems.
“Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are, the bird is going to knock over the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it won.”
You fell in the the Tankie argument trap where nothing they say makes any sense yet they still think youre the idiot. You also sometimes feel like an idiot trying to deconstruct the incoherent trans theyre saying.
We never argued tankie anything.
From Modikins first response it was all pedantic drivel. Nothing of substance. They started by attacking my bad analogies, without actually reading them. I just played the game they started, and took it to its logical conclusion.
You truly don't know how to read do you. You should go take night classes. Learning to read is very important.
What?
Right. You probably can't actually understand what I'm saying.
Go here
https://img.freepik.com/premium-vector/school-building-illustration_638438-385.jpg
This good
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcTKnVp3abpKHU6VI-9TV3Rova8rKtVHp-b0Sg&s=
Make you smart.
You thought this was chess?
With your first reply you played a game of pointless pedantic posturing in the pursuit of pretend points. I just had fun playing along during moments of down time between patients.
No, it wasn't chess. It was me spanking you logically, pigeon.
Pretending to out position, a pigeon playing at being a person, may be a preposterously puerile peacock, like I've never perceived.
You got your cheeks clapped in an argument and now you're trying to downplay it. 👏 👏 👏
Hell my checks clap whenever I walk, that's got nothing to do with this.
👏...👏...👏...