this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
1354 points (98.1% liked)

Memes

51711 readers
2513 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sandouq_Dyatha@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

stop talking about novels like they're historical studies or facts

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Getting too close to comfort for you?

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The fact that they're this mad says yes.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Reminds me of the same reaction, but inverse for the right, when Squid Game first came out. The right keeps insisting that the show is about socialism, even though the creator explicitly mentioned it's about capitalism.

[–] Sandouq_Dyatha@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

no, it's a novel, it's a work of fiction, not a piece of theory or history that you can quote, the ending and the world is entirely built by the writer, there's no study it's literally arguments made up by the writer based on no sources or research, anyone can write a dystopian story, I could write a dystopian story and quote it right now, it's not argument, it's stupid.

You know, in my novel of people who quote novels ending up as nazis, you do resemble it a lot.

/\ as valid as using a novel like 1984 or animal farm or whatever else as an argument

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

1984 and Brave New World are allegories based on real life social observations and events. So, yes, they are based on history. They are famous for a reason. It is just that you find it too close to comfort.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're famous because the US regime uses them to indoctrinate children in their flag pledging factories

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think I heard Americans pledge in the name of Huxley and Orwell.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

are you being deliberately stupid as a joke right now?

[–] Sandouq_Dyatha@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

my 3 sentence novel is also based on observing you.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes, anyone right of you is a Nazi.

How original. Pulitzer prize winning.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Looks like you found it too close for comfort

[–] Sandouq_Dyatha@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 week ago

Anyone who criticizes your usage of novels as meaning anything got hit close home

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not history, but it's certainly theory. The study it's based on is through observations of reality. When comparing something to one of these books, we're testing their observations by comparing them to reality. Incidentally, it gets brought up a lot when an event, occurrence, or vector in society begins to resemble these books too closely.

Your hyperbole of people quoting books all being nazis, on the other hand, is very easily disproven.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"this is giving boss baby vibes" except actually trying to make a point out of it

Your hyperbole of people quoting books all being nazis

Only the dumbest fucking people pull this shit and you are as fucking stupid as can be measured

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Considering what you measure with, that doesn't have much meaning.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Explain to me how you think I'm measuring, fuckwit. You have a judgement on a thing, you should be able to articulate what that thing is, right?

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Badly; as someone who is culturally illiterate, lacks the skills of observation to make any determination (whether it be about myself or the subject of the world around us), is incapable of actually making any arguments, and so uses "colourful language" in a juvenile attempt to cover up their shortcomings.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The question I asked you was to explain the method by which I was making a judgement, which you presumed to know.

Can you answer it, stupid? Or are we going to get another paragraph about how you being snide is supposed to obscure the fact that you can't maintain a coherent thought throughout one of your posts?

Mister five subordinate clauses per sentence.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well, I rest my case. You are a... pointless individual. I do hope you have better luck in real life than on the internet.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml -1 points 6 days ago

No, you're a pointless individual because you literally have no point in this argument. I asked you for what your point was and you've done nothing but evade and insult. You're a vapid fucking idiot. See? I can actually stake a position.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How dare people use novels used to express political thoughts when political topics come up.

[–] Sandouq_Dyatha@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As we all know, a cultural understanding of works of literature that influenced its readers is exactly like one weirdo on twitter being weird about a movie. Brilliant.

[–] Sandouq_Dyatha@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

#TrumpWinning looking like the next #Orwell novel and the good guys lost. My god.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Aren’t they though, at this point?

[–] Sandouq_Dyatha@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

go back to reddit.