this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
649 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

73342 readers
4800 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
649
UK households could face VPN 'ban' after use skyrockets following Online Safety Bill (www.birminghammail.co.uk)
submitted 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) by themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
187 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Prominent backbench MP Sarah Champion launched a campaign against VPNs previously, saying: “My new clause 54 would require the Secretary of State to publish, within six months of the Bill’s passage, a report on the effect of VPN use on Ofcom’s ability to enforce the requirements under clause 112.

"If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.” And the Labour Party said there were “gaps” in the bill that needed to be amended.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JK_Flip_Flop@lemmy.world 38 points 12 hours ago (6 children)

If this comes to anything I'm moving to somewhere in the EU and pursuing citizenship there. This is clearly not about protecting the children anymore (not that it ever was).

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 32 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

EU is about to do the exact same thing. Norway is the place to be. That's where I went - at least according to my ip address.

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Huh. I’m also “moving” soon. Any reason for Norway over Switzerland?

[–] sun@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 minutes ago* (last edited 2 minutes ago)

Norway is fine.

[–] LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure about the situation in Norway, but Switzerland has a quite right-conservative government and is also expanding their surveillance , e.g. Proton freezes Swiss investment over surveillance fears

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 hours ago

I saw this news and I guess it’s good that privacy is being discussed somewhat soberly over there in the wake of this investment decision.

Personally I have recently been exiting out of the UK, a much more invasive country, so Switzerland for now does seem like an improvement for me. Norway is further out geographically and has less Mullvad servers, would seem like the less favorable option for me unless the proposed laws actually pass.

Frankly I’m scrambling after the UK’s ID thing.

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 1 points 10 hours ago

No other than it's geographically closer to my actual location so I thought the speed would be faster.

load more comments (4 replies)