this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
60 points (98.4% liked)

Games

16806 readers
867 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (9 children)

109000 copies at $40 minus the 30% steam cut. That's about 3 million dollars they're walking away with.

[–] Amanduh@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Way more people refunded after the first day lol

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

The company disappeared though, they still let people refund?

[–] dracs@programming.dev 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I saw someone say that Valve holds back a portion of the revenue to cover potential refunds. If that's true, I wonder if that's calculated dynamically as it sounds like this is a higher than normal refund rate.

[–] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 1 points 11 months ago

With as fast as this happened, Valve likely didn't even cut the first check yet.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)