this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
263 points (96.8% liked)

Linux

57604 readers
910 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by AlpΓ‘r-Etele MΓ©der, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 51 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Obligatory: "Use Debian instead of Ubuntu. It's basically Ubuntu without Snap."

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

it was always wild to me back in the day when so many container images were based on ubuntu… was like PLEASE debian is functionally identical here at like 1/10th the base container size!

[–] lightrush@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mostly yes but there are functional differences in convenience. For example the standard upgrade process is completely manual. You have to disable third party repos. You have to change the repos. You have to check if you have space. You have to remove obsolete oackages. And more. On Ubuntu, the software update tool does all that, eliminating a lot of possibility for error. To an exoerienced user, the Debian process is fine. A novice would have plenty of opportunity for frustration and pain.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What? Software Center is GNOME, not Ubuntu. Discover is KDE, not Ubuntu. Debian updates can be done the same way? I don't do any of the things you mention. Using SC or just apt upgrade works just fine.

[–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're talking about a Debian 12 -> Debian 13 upgrade

On Debian, you get release notes on what commands to run.

Ubuntu has their own software update utility, separate from Software Center or Discover, that runs the commands for you

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ahhh OK. I've always gone fresh for a full upgrade. But does apt dist-upgrade not work? That's what the docs say to do.

[–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You have to at least modify your sources.list.d manually first. For most people, updating sources.list.d and running full-upgrade will probably work fine...

The full instructions are

  1. run dist-upgrade
  2. remove back ports
  3. remove obsolete packages
  4. remove non-debian packages
  5. clean up old configuration files
  6. add non-free-firmware (this is a 12 -> 13 specific)
  7. remove proposed updates
  8. disable pinning
  9. update sources.list.d to point to the next release
  10. apt upgrade --without-new-packages
  11. apt full-upgrade

It takes like an hour? but it's still not "just press okay."

Ubuntu's has broken on some upgrades for friends and they had to do the whole Debian process manually, but it does try to automate the removals, disablements, and updating sources

Edit: instructions taken from Trixie release. I skipped some that aren't really unique, like make a backup

https://www.debian.org/releases/trixie/release-notes/upgrading.en.html

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 1 week ago

Ahh yea, thats not too great

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

I prefer "ubuntu without the bullshit"

[–] deadcream@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It has much slower release cycle and ancient kernel. For people with new hardware it's not suitable.

[–] Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Unless you prototype in a cpu fab it does not matter, debian 13 came out last week and its kernel is not that old

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This is why Backports exists. You can get any newer packages or kernels you need by enabling it.

And Ubuntu LTS doesn't go much farther ahead than base Debian.

[–] seralth@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you need to rely on back ports to have day to day function of HARDWARE. Then your OS is not suitable to your use case. Backport reliance should not be the norm for your avg user.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 1 week ago

I disagree, since this is why Backports was made. That being said, everyone is entitled to their opinion.

[–] dropped_packet@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At that point why not just run a rolling release? Debians whole selling point is stability which backports kinda ruins.

[–] vandsjov@feddit.dk 3 points 1 week ago

I would argue that backporting one package does not ruin everything. If you backport a lot of stuff, then I would agree that it changing distrio to something more up-to-date should be considered because of the increase of potential problems.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 1 points 1 week ago

A great way to brick your system and enter the package versionning conflict hell