this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
1223 points (98.9% liked)

Games

41647 readers
1353 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Anyone know if this is true or not?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's your job to keep your kid from cruising porn on the devices you own

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What about the devices you don't own?

And regardless, how are parents that struggle to setup their email going to keep their kid from accessing porn? What would you have them do? Install a 3rd party software? Setup a local DNS filter? Prevent them from using devices that can access the internet? When it is as easy as googling "naked girl" how on earth are parents going to stop them from access it. The answer? The aren't. There is nothing even the most diligent parent can do to stop them from accessing it while it is so readily accessible.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You haven't demonstrated what harm comes from googling naked girl and seeing boobs.

If you want devices with parental control you will need to pay for them.

Devices like school computers already have such. This won't stop a determined person from borrowing their friends phone and googling naked girl but that is a reasonable trade off honestly.

I don't want to turn the entire Internet into 1984 so your kids doesn't see boobs until he's 18

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

You haven’t demonstrated what harm comes from googling naked girl and seeing boobs.

I cannot, since I am not a researcher. The research is out there though.

If you want devices with parental control you will need to pay for them.

If it is definitively negative, parents should not have to research, install, and pay for such restrictions onky to be easily avoided on another device.

I don’t want to turn the entire Internet into 1984 so your kids doesn’t see boobs until he’s 18

I don't have kids. This about an entire generation and all future ones. Have you read 1984? While sueveillance is a part of it, it's largely about authoritarianism and the control of reality itself. Being ID'd for a porn site is not that. 1984 is already happening, and the porn has nothing to do with it. Regardless, you have made no comment on the idea that I want it done with zero knowledge proof. The site would know nothing about you except you are over 18. There is absolutely nothing 1984 about that

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Which country anywhere has ever implemented a zero knowledge proof of age rather than using a id or information trivially linkable to an id. The answer is none have none intend to and none will its a complete fabrication to cover actual reality.

Nor is it liable to be limited to outright porno.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The truth is out there is what people say about big foot, the flat earth, UFOs, and lizard people.

You have to pay monthly for devices that access the internet at all. It doesn't seem unreasonable that YOU not everyone should have to pay for something that is safe for your 8 year old rather than just getting your 8 year old an Ipad and wifi. This forum isn't safe for an 8 year old.

Regardless, you have made no comment on the idea that I want it done with zero knowledge proof.

Because there is no indication that that is ever going to happen. Either nothing with happen. A few hardcore porn sites will get age gating because they want to do legit business whilst others hosted in other countries will do nothing ensuring your teen still finds boobs when he searches OR we will go full on 1984 and this will mostly be used to suppress the entire free and open internet in the US.

Your fantasy that this will be done safely is just an indication that you are stupid.

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

https://www.newamerica.org/oti/briefs/exploring-privacy-preserving-age-verification/

The privacy-preserving promise of this “double blind” method has inspired various countries to further explore and develop ZKP-based age verification solutions. In the European Union (EU), a ZKP age verification protocol is being developed as part of a European-wide EU Digital Identity (EUID) framework. However, some organizations have pushed back against linking age verification tools to digital identity solutions, citing concerns over potential misuse and user privacy. While the EUID solution is set to be released by the end of 2026, the EU launched an interim age verification app in the meantime.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

So no country in the world has such a system that actually protects privacy in practice

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Right now, yes. But this is all still very new. There was a point in time where all internet traffic was HTTP. Would you have called me stupid for suggesting internet traffic would be encrypted in the future? My point is research is being done, and it can be done securely. If it can be done securely, it seems most arguments against it would no longer be applicable. There would still be the issue of convenience, but this whole 1984 idea would not apply here. There are so many other area's that are more concerning as far as ideas that 1984 goes. The current US government is constantly denying reality and manipulating history. Controlling harmful internet pornography should not be lumped in with them to dismiss valid concerns and actual research with legitimate secure solutions

[–] socsa@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Literally none of this is my problem. I do not give two shits what other people's children do on the Internet.

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That's what people said when they took away cigarette vending machines. Why should adults have to suffer because other people can't control their children

[–] socsa@piefed.social 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I guess if you still hold that belief, then it is fair you think ID for internet pron is also wrong. Though I imagine most people support the controling of alcohol and cigarette sales. In which case internet pornography should fall into the same category