this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2025
-4 points (48.0% liked)

Memes

52343 readers
738 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

"Nation of workers" lol

Some animals are more equal than others.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 20 points 3 weeks ago

Quote harry potter next if you're gonna be getting your political education from children's fables

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 13 points 2 weeks ago

You wanna elaborate on that, or are we supposed to feel convinced when you simply... restate the thing the meme is making fun of, but in an even more cliche sentence?

Do you think there's people out there joining the PSL or some other communist party who are gonna hear this 7th grade tier criticism and change their minds, or do you say it just for your own comfort?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

On Orwell

Isaac Asimov on 1984

A Critical Read of Animal Farm

Towards a Critique of Totalitarianism

Orwell hated the working class, his chief critique was that the working class is too stupid to think for itself and that it is destined to be swayed by whoever is most charismatic. The same monster snitched on gays, jewish people, and communists to the British government, and during WWII claimed that criticizing the USSR was the real litmus test of a leftist. That's not even getting into his history of sexual assault.

As for the USSR in reality, read Blackshirts and Reds and This Soviet World. If the CPSU was a "ruling class," it absolutely failed at being so. The discrepancy between the wealthiest and poorest in the Soviet Union was around ten times, but that number is in the thousands to billions in the Tsarist and capitalist eras respectively, and not just in Russia, but all capitalist systems.

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Imagine criticizing Orwell for not thinking for himself

by posting links to a bunch of people criticizing Orwell lmfao

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

...what? I criticized Orwell for his hatred of the working class, anti-semitism, homophobia, work with MI6, anti-communism, being a sex-pest, and criticizing the country that was responsible for 85% of Nazi soldiers killed during World War II in the midst of fighting said genocidal invader. The issue wasn't "thinking for himself," it's him being a social fascist antisemitic fed. Critique of him is by no means hypocritical.

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world -5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Do you have some theory reading which supports that, comrade? If not then you should read more theory, comrade. Make sure to post like 15 paragraph replies when you're done compiling your theories.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I already posted the sources for Orwell being a piece of shit at the beginning of this conversation, though that certainly isn't "theory." It's just documenting how much of a piece of shit Orwell was as a human being.

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world -5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Comrade earlier you said that the CPSU was a failure, why are you so critical of glorious leaders, comrade? Would it be so bad if they were in charge of everything, comrade? You need to read more theory, comrade.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is just incoherent slop, are you doing it for your personal amusement? Is defending an antisemitic homophobic fed worth it to you?

Plus, I never said the CPSU was a failure.

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world -4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The one of the defensive is you, and the people you're defending allied with the nazis to split Europe between themselves as well as enabled the nazis war effort via trade of necessary materials.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

A thread. TL;DR no, lol.

The communists spent the decade prior trying to form an anti-Nazi coalition force, such as the Anglo-French-Soviet Alliance which was pitched by the communists and rejected by the British and French. The communists hated the Nazis from the beginning, as the Nazi party rose to prominence by killing communists and labor organizers, cemented bourgeois rule, and was violently racist and imperialist, while the communists opposed all of that.

When the many talks of alliances with the west all fell short, the Soviets reluctantly agreed to sign a non-agression pact, in order to delay the coming war that everyone knew was happening soon. Throughout the last decade, Britain, France, and other western countries had formed pacts with Nazi Germany, such as the Four-Power Pact, the German-French-Non-Agression Pact, and more. Molotov-Ribbentrop was unique among the non-agression pacts with Nazi Germany in that it was right on the eve of war, and was the first between the USSR and Nazi Germany. It was a last resort, when the west was content from the beginning with working alongside Hitler.

Harry Truman, in 1941 in front of the Senate, stated:

If we see that Germany is winning we ought to help Russia, and if Russia is winning we ought to help Germany, and that way let them kill as many as possible, although I don’t want to see Hitler victorious under any circumstances.

Not only that, but it was the Soviet Union that was responsible for 4/5ths of total Nazi deaths, and winning the war against the Nazis. The Soviet Union did not agree to invade Poland with the Nazis, it was about spheres of influence and red lines the Nazis should not cross in Poland. When the USSR went into Poland, it stayed mostly to areas Poland had invaded and annexed a few decades prior. Should the Soviets have let Poland get entirely taken over by the Nazis, standing idle? The West made it clear that they were never going to help anyone against the Nazis until it was their turn to be targeted.

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world -5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ah glorious theory to read thank you comrade much reading to do comrade.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Hey man, I saw some of your posts and while you're here, I just want to thank you for all the work you do making anticommunists look both factually ignorant and personally deranged. rosa-salute

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Again, are you doing this for your own amusement, or what?

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world -5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Are you? Or do they pay you for this?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's useful to use generic anticommunists as a springboard. I don't get paid to do this, I'm a communist for free.

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world -5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You don't promote communism, though. You promote dictators.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Source? I talk about theory, current events, etc, and even made an intro ML reading guide that a few people seem to like.

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world -5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

lmao

comrade doesn't get it, it conflicts with the theory they've read

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Didn't say that, you just outright didn't clarify your vague, vacuous statement. You, on the other hand, defended a homophobic, anti-semitic, rapist fed.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

Goddamn you're dumb

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

You have no credibility and no dignity

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

You're bad at this

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

Babyschool book written by a cop, be better