this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
611 points (99.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

64763 readers
215 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 75 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I first read the original report from Android Authority thinking it would only be an additional hurdle for third-party stores and developers, but I'm now thinking that it would potentially block the use of ReVanced

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah I don't know what they'll block yet but I'm already assuming some of my apps will be blocked. It's pretty terrible news. I really didn't want to have to hunt down a phone that was compatible with alternative OS's.

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

From my understanding, it will only allow apps that were registered, so since ReVanced uses identical package names to the patched apps, it probably won't work unless they start using ReVanced-specific package names that are tied to their identity. But that would allow Google to block these package names (or ban ReVanced completely) if say, Spotify or YouTube complain about them.

[–] archonet@lemy.lol 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

if say, Spotify or YouTube complain about them.

... who owns YouTube?

Yeah, they're going to block ReVanced.

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Unless revanced somehow gets the APKs resigned it will almost certainly destroy revanced.

[–] jim3692@discuss.online 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What if I come up with a random package name, like "online.discuss.jim3692", register that name and a keypair, and then build ReVanced using that name and keys?

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because Google will find out and revoke the key

[–] jim3692@discuss.online 2 points 1 month ago

What if I keep the apks for me and my family, instead of publicly releasing them.

This is probably similar to the state of Piped and Invidious. Google tries to kill them, so we are hosting private instances, instead of relying on public ones.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

google can just revoke it if they dont like it. they certainly want to become apple down the line.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

and any apk installed eventually, and custom OS, that doesnt come from the google store front. im not tech savvy but im using apk of many apps right now. if only someone can develop a "storefront" where it seperate from google.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

I mean, there’s fdroid…. For now