this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
566 points (99.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

63791 readers
399 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de 52 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Google has been been cracking down on installing .apk's on your phone for years and they're getting more and more aggressive about it. It's not a question of if they'll disallow it completely, but when.

It's already extremely tedious. Back in the Android 2.3 days (oh, good old Gingerbread) you could just get an APK and install it, but those times are long gone.

Years ago they threatened the developer of Total Commander to remove his app from the PlayStore unless he patched out an APK install feature, so he was forced to do that.

Now another example: Try to install eBay on a phone that is not passing device integrity. It is not listed on the PlayStore because your device doesn't pass safety checks. You can grab an APK and install it, but the OS will check if the app has been installed through the PlayStore and if it hasn't, it will complain and close itself.

GrapheneOS has patched that bullshit out, btw.

And this behaviour happens with all apps where the developer has enabled the "App Integrity" option, which is heavily pushed as a super-great security feature. So developers might just enable that feature, not being fully aware of the implications.

As you can see, it's one method at a time, slowly but surely, until Google fully controls the ecosystem. The intention behind that is pretty clear: They don't want people to have AdAway and Revanced, they want money and user data. And they also want you to login to the PlayStore, get hooked on their stupid daily points challenges and spend your hard-earned money on virtual crap.

This is textbook enshittification, it will only get worse from here on.

[–] Amir@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

AdAway can be easily emulated using a DNS server...

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yeah I carry that DNS server around with me in the other pocket /s

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

Oddly enough your phone is more than powerful enough to do that.

[–] Amir@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Idk why you're meming, it's easy as hell to run it on device, or you can just use dns.adguard.com instead

[–] NotKyloRen@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be fair, unless you're using a private, controllable DNS with a frontend interface (like NextDNS, Pihole, etc) -- DNS ad blocking is "all or nothing". Those apps let you control which apps and services and domains come through.

[–] Amir@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

I'm aware, I choose to use the adguard one but I've used the on-device ones in the past