this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16785 readers
811 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
7
Overwatch 2 is now Steam's "worst game of all time" (www.eurogamer.net)
submitted 1 year ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] r1veRRR@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is everybody just now finding out how capitalism works? Any public company is LEGALLY REQUIRED to care only about shareholder profits. It is literally illegal for them to do anything else.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a widespread belief my friend, that is just not true.

[–] r1veRRR@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's absolutely true in practice. CEOs have gotten sued for not acting in the shareholders best interests.

And in relation to the original comment I replied to, are you truly saying that companies, esp. public companies, are not, FOR ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES, beholden to making money for the shareholders? Any "nice" company will make less money, will not compete well, will then fail or be bought out by the less nice, more profitable company.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

Im not a lawyer, but I've looked into this misunderstanding before and it stems from what constitutes "breaking one's fiduciary duty to investors. While deliberately acting against the interests of investors is illegal, ive yet to hear of a lawsuit, let alone a successful one, brought by an investor for not making all of the money. Id be interested in hearing an investment oriented lawyers perspective since from what i understand, the full extent of fiduciary duty has not been tested that way in court