Greentext

7100 readers

723 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works

908

Anon doesn't like AI (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 2 days ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works

268 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Replacing all jobs won’t create true abundance because the resources required to create things are finite, namely land and space in general

We'll have solved these problems though, space wise whether it be by reducing ones footprint down to practically nothing, with nanobots ensuring our bodies get fully taken care of or through expansion to other planets

Resource wise we'll simply be using fully renewable resources, we're talking end game here, all jobs are being done by computers, there is nothing left for us to do but have fun or babies? I duno what we'd do if all jobs were fully completed and there was literally no work left

It's also difficult to say how these problems will be solved without coming across like "it's the future!"

Paintings reveal what people in 1900 thought the year 2000 would look like

https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/paintings-future-1900-2000-b1916391.html

[–] Get_Off_My_WLAN@fedia.io 6 points 2 days ago

I like those 1900s French drawings. They're pretty steampunk.