this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
517 points (86.6% liked)

Technology

75434 readers
2065 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

archive.is link to article from allabout.ai at https://www.allaboutai.com/resources/ai-statistics/ai-environment/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lime@feddit.nu 111 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (17 children)

idk if that's the intended takeaway from those numbers.

According to AllAboutAI analysis, global AI processing generates over 260,930 kilograms of CO₂ monthly from ChatGPT alone, equivalent to 260 transatlantic flights, with 1 billion daily queries consuming 300 MWh of electricity.

according to the faa there are on average 5500 planes in the air every day, and while i couldn't find an exact number there seem to be between 350 and 1 200 transatlantic flights every day, depending on season.

260 tons is still massive, but let's not kid ourselves. it's about equivalent to producing 12 new american-size cars.

[–] leftthegroup@lemmings.world 0 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Yes, but there's zero fucking actual benefit.

Seeing memes posted here that use AI while sitting on it is the most confusing thing to me.

Just... don't use it, people. The hole burning in AI bros' pockets will close up if you just stop making it profitable. Even the free ones are making money with ads. Don't use it, even for a joke.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Frankly focusing on the carbon output of AI models is a red herring. It's not a significant part of the problem and just makes people complacent in the form of feeling like we've achieved something if it succeeds. It's not worse than stuff like video games

Focus on the actual negative effects of AI, but carbon intensity isn't a major one

[–] dditty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

I'm much more concerned about AI datacenters' use of evaporative cooling draining freshwater reserves than the carbon footprint atm

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)