this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
374 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

71754 readers
3634 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

AI spam is already starting to ruin the internet::We're starting to see one prediction come true of how artificial intelligence will affect the internet: AI-generated spam is flooding the web.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frunch@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I've been hearing Kagi is very good but i don't know if I'm ready to start paying for a search engine. Given the direction things are headed through, it could be worth considering

[–] UNWILLING_PARTICIPANT@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I can say that kagi is really good, yes. I don't know if google search was actually ever this good on its own, but I'm finding it a real breath of fresh air

[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's a lot better value for families, too. Much like spotify. I wouldn't pay £8/m for myself, but I would pay £16 for 6 people.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 1 points 1 year ago

You can even share the same account with your family because your queries are not logged and won't show up in another computer

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)