this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2025
605 points (99.2% liked)
Greentext
7182 readers
813 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Well, is Windows?
So far it's working fine, yeah. No need to choose among a zillion distros someone swears is the best, I know for a fact there are first-party drivers for everything, no need to fiddle around with CLI, it plays everything my graphics card can muster, and I don't need to worry about game compatibility or whether Nvidia deigned to support my OS.
Windows has a lot of problems, but if you're just looking to play games without too much complexity... It's as close to "it just works" as I can imagine getting without switching to a console (or limiting myself to the few games that work on Apple devices, I guess).
Plus, big argument, it's familiar. You can forgive more annoyances when you're not learning something new. Humans are just lazy like that.
First and foremost, I do think Windows is the better choice for most people to play games on, mostly due to vendor support.
However, I'd say that a lot of people have some sort of issue with Windows, albeit probably less than they would have with some Linux distributions. I just wanted to express that "without headaches" is a goal that is maybe higher than necessary.
Nowadays most people just recommend Bazzite if you just want to game
Just googled "best Linux distro for gaming," and got about 10 different recommendations.
You're literally the person your quote is describing lol
Yea, but the issue is, Windows works because others don't, like linux. Windows gets preferrential baby treatment from all consumer tech manufacturers... A perfect example is my laptop. I have ubuntu on it. NOTHING works right because Lenovo decided to only support linux and my employer didn't check and neither did they agree to invest some of my hours to investigate. Now I'm stuck with it. So i ask: is that Linux's fault, or Lenovo's, or whose is it?.. Either way it's not Linux's fault...
Lenovo decided only to support linux? What?
The drivers for the proprietary hardware are all windows only. And, A LOT of the drivers this machine needs are proprietary. It has a fancy camera with good res and some IR...thing on it, but it only works in 480p resolution and has heavy smearing because 1. It doesn't use a normal free driver and 2. The driver Lenovo made for it to work is only available on Windows as an exe, and I'm really not knowledgeable enough to try to get it to work on a work machine... If you know what I can do please educate me but I'm not willing to guess and then have to pay for the thing... If you want details it's the ThinkBook G6 17 IML. The camera thing is just an example.
I have a lenovo machine and it works like a charm with Linux (I think) i assumed they were linux friendly. Maybe not.
Had this conversation with my brother the other day...I'm all for Linux gaming and he is staying with windows because learning something new is antithesis to his having fun. I totally get it.
What a reasonable person you are! /gen
I supported windows for a while... I'm not sure I went more than an hour or two without going to command line to fix something or another.
Let’s at least not exaggerate, because it’s not particularly useful if you’re trying to get someone to switch. If someone is on the fence about it and sees comments like yours, they’ll be more likely to go “oh well I don’t have those kinds of issues with Windows, so it must just be them.” The vast majority of Windows users (office workers, people using it to check emails and browse Facebook, people just using it for Steam, etc) will literally never need to use CLI.
If you’re needing to use CLI every hour or two on Windows, that sounds more like you’re using the wrong tool for the job. Essentially, you’re trying to use a drill when you need a hammer. A drill may function as a hammer… But it’ll probably take a lot of extra effort. And it’ll likely end up damaging the tool, because you’re using it for something it wasn’t designed to do.
I was a windows sysadmin doing mostly software deployment and automation. I was definitely an edge case. Point is, windows has a command line and requires it for a lot of tasks.
If something is broken in windows, tough luck. I always find if something is broken in Linux, someone has a fix