this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

59674 readers
2912 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
0
Neuralink’s human trials volunteers ‘should have serious concerns,’ say medical experts (www.popsci.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Neuralink’s human trials volunteers ‘should have serious concerns,’ say medical experts::A medical ethics committee responded to Elon Musk's brain-interface startup issuing an open call for patients yesterday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nodsocket@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (7 children)

This is a publicity stunt to get more funding. They are going to get some volunteers, but they won't ever get the implants. Neuralink will just keep delaying the procedure by a year and then cancel it once the public stops paying attention.

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I think you are hating simply because musk, they have FDA approval. People are going to get this implant in their brain, and if I remember I'll come back here and send you a message that you were wrong when it happens.

[–] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

FDA approval ain't evidence that something is safe. See the recent approvals for anti-Alzheimers meds that have a terrible side-effect to benefit ratio.

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

For sure, that's what the testing is for. Now that a device has been put in a human it will be determined if it's safe over many years and trials.

[–] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

If something is dangerous in animal testing, it shouldn't reach humans. The FDA is toothless (due to underfunding and regulatory capture).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)