this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2025
110 points (96.6% liked)

Selfhosted

52232 readers
984 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

One more step to unhitching from Google...

Right now the only option I see in F-Droid is Aegis.

I'm not sure what to actually look for side from checking for unexpected permissions and reasonably frequent updates.

Hopefully something I can sync with a GNOME app...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] example@reddthat.com 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

that's like calling strong randomly generated passwords 1.5FA.

with proper MFA, even if you steal my password (database), you won't be able to steal my account, as you're missing the second factor. with classic otp this is just a single use number you enter on the potentially compromised system, but if you get the seed (secret) stolen, valid numbers can be generated continuously.

password managers (should) protect against reuse. MFA protects against logins on untrusted and potentially compromised systems/keyloggers if they're not extracted live. password managers with auto fill and phishing resistant MFA can prevent phising, although the password manager variant is still easily bypassed when the user isn't paying enough attention, as it's not even that uncommon for login domains to change. obviously there are also other risks on compromised devices, like session cookie exfiltration, and there is a lot of bullshit info around from websites, especially the ones harvesting phone numbers while claiming to require it for 2FA just to gaslight users.

[–] hikaru755@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

even if you steal my password (database)

That's a big leap you're doing there, equating stealing a password to stealing a password database. Those are very different. Stealing a password can be done through regular phishing, or a host of other methods that don't require targeted effort. Stealing a password database, if properly set up, is a lot harder than that. It depends of course on what password manager you're using, but it usually involves multiple factors itself. So equating that to just a password, no matter how strong and random, is just misleading.

Mind you, I agree that it's less secure than "proper" MFA, and I'm not saying that everybody should just use MFA through a PW manager. I am using physical security keys myself. But for a lot of regular people that otherwise just couldn't be bothered, it's absolutely a viable alternative that makes them a whole lot safer for comparatively little effort. Telling them they just shouldn't bother at all is just going to create more victims. There is no such thing as perfect security, and everyone has a different risk profile.