This is incorrect I'm afraid. The OHCHR assessment should have indicated genocide. I suspect that admitting you're wrong is difficult for you, but in this case it's patently clear for the reasons I stated above. This difference in terminology is pedantic; what's important is the suffering and persecution that's going on in China, and you've failed to address any of it. I wish you the best of luck in your journey, but I have no more time to donate to you. Have a day.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 hours ago

The OHCHR assessment should have indicated genocide.

Uhuh, so It's not incorrect, you just disagree

I suspect that admitting you’re wrong is difficult for you

Go back to reddit you fucking loser.

This difference in terminology is pedantic

Are, you're into the "Words don't mean things!" phase of argument.

This difference in terminology is pedantic; what’s important is the suffering and persecution that’s going on in China, and you’ve failed to address any of it.

Uhuh, so like I said, just blatant Motte and Baillie

I wish you the best of luck in your journey, but I have no more time to donate to you. Have a day.

“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.” ― Jean-Paul Sartre