I don't really see what you mean, but either way, I don't think this conversation is going to be particularly productive. I generally agree with how Wikipedia described liberalism in that intro paragraph, MAGA fits a lot of it as well.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I meant the original topic of this discussion about non-liberal movements. Why you and Wikipedia consider MAGA (Trumpism) differently is, yeah that's a discussion for some other day. The original topic is cleared up

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Fair enough. I see the whole DNC vs GOP division as liberal infighting.