this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
974 points (97.7% liked)

Not The Onion

18462 readers
652 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Okokimup@lemmy.world 71 points 4 days ago (5 children)

The district pointed to a state law enacted in 2022, which mandates that school sports teams must be designated “based on the biological sex of the students who participate” in the sport. A federal judge blocked enforcement of that law in 2023, but only against two trans student-athletes who filed suit against it. (An appeals court upheld that injunction last year, and the Supreme Court declined to take up the case this summer.)

Any chance this is some malicious compliance?

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 4 days ago

It's really a no win situation though if the boy complies. Newsmax will show footage of a game he plays in as evidence that boys are playing in girls sports, and the idiots who watch will believe it and support even worse politicians and laws.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

Could be! I was just commenting that the kid could engage in malicious compliance. Let's see what happens when he exits the girls locker room with wet hair and a towel around his neck.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 9 points 3 days ago

The law in question doesn't actually mandate that school sports teams must be designated “based on the biological sex of the students who participate” in the sport. If you read the law, it only prohibits biological males from participating in female sports. It does not prohibit biological females from participating in male sports. Quite the contrary, it specifically acknowledges that all students, regardless of sex or gender, are allowed to participate in "boys" sports.

https://codes.findlaw.com/az/title-15-education/az-rev-st-sect-15-120-02/

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't see what part of that even requires them to use the birth certificate

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's the stupid conservative part. If they make an exception for him, then they need to make exceptions for trans girls

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago

Unfortunately, no they don't. You think these people believe their constituents have brains?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Any chance this is some malicious compliance?

It could be fear. No one wants a bunch of Karen’s screaming in their face. No one wants to be sued or fired. Maybe this is just someone who thinks they need to protect themselves over the kids they’re responsible for