this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
        
      
      41 points (68.1% liked)
      Memes
    52986 readers
  
      
      1330 users here now
      Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
        founded 6 years ago
      
      MODERATORS
      
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
    view the rest of the comments
 
          
          
it's missing the words "authoritarian" and "dictator" lol
It's also missing the "Uyghurs in concentration camp" picture.
https://lemmy.ml/post/37946260
part of me wishes i hadn't read through this because the way you're taught to read-between-the-lines in any literature in the west combined with the american narrative of chinese authoritarianism that all of us have been swallowing since birth makes some of the wording read like copy-pastes from some propaganda that you would expect to encounter from a dystopian novel like 1984.
these in particular are cringe worthy::
the entire basis of 60,000 people willing taking in a lecture from government officials also sounds suspicious AF to westerners. we popular regard anyone willingly doing so as subversively intellectual or socially bizarre in some way because it's assumed that any "normal person" would naturally rather pursue something more entertaining if they're not coerced to do so otherwise.
this is a bit of cultural double standard because all western cultures universally regard these sorts of lectures as fundamental and important; but at the same time we popularly only expect people with an agenda or "odd balls" to engage with it willingly.
it's pretty clear to me that there's a cultural disconnect between westerners and the chinese; with the latter exhibiting cultural norms so lofty that westerners regard it as unrealistic or unachievable and that makes the entire episode seem suspicious to us and now i think i can now understand how the "Uyghur genocide" propaganda took root.
libs can't comprehend a democratic system within a single pluralistic party.
Which is weird if they live in the US, which has a single pluralistic party.
i wouldn't call their two far-right cells that pluralistic though
— Gore Vidal