this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
977 points (97.8% liked)

Not The Onion

18468 readers
525 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If that was it, they could just have obtained a signed affidavit from the parents and perhaps their doctors

A trans person could take advantage of the same mechanism, which is why it's not allowed. They care more about hurting trans people than they worry about the few cis kids that fall through the cracks. This kid was just acceptable collateral damage in their culture war.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It is allowed. Doesn't matter if the trans person takes advantage of the same mechanism, the difference would be they would be the ones liable for lying. That's what an affidavit does, transfers and diminishes liability.