this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
96 points (93.6% liked)

Selfhosted

52629 readers
1185 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I personally think of a small DIY rack stuffed with commodity HDDs off Ebay with an LVM spanned across a bunch of RAID1s. I don't want any complex architectural solutions since my homelab's scale always equals 1. To my current understanding this has little to no obvious drawbacks. What do you think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] squinky@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] melfie@lemy.lol 2 points 1 day ago

Ha, I went down the whole Ceph and Longhorn path as well, then ended up with hostPath and btrfs. Glad I’m not the only one who considers the former options too much of a headache after fully evaluating them.

[–] MrModest@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Why btrfs and not ZFS? In my info bubble, the btrfs has a reputation of an unstable FS and people ended up with unrecoverable data.

[–] unit327@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Btrfs used to be easier to install because it is part of the kernel while zfs required shenanigans, though I think that has changed now.

Btrfs also just works with whatever drives of mismatched sizes you throw at it and adding more later is easy. This used to be impossible with zfs pools but I think is a feature now?

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Just the 5-6 raid modes are shit. And its weird willingness to let you boot a failed raid without letting you know a drive is borked.

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

That is apparently not the case anymore, but ZFS is certainly more rich in features and more battle-tested.