Technology

This ignore situation were kids didn't have social media and abusers post it there. Like sexual assaults and exploitation of childrens.

Not having a moderated platform with the ability to be private is something the platform should be held responsible for.

Imagine you have a studium full of fans waiting for the match to start, then someone comes in with a big screen playing a sexual abuse video then leave the stadium. It is normal to sue the stadium for lack of security along with suing the abuser.

Issues like bullying is harder but when the social network doesn't remove abuse content they are at fault.

Facebook remove staff and systematically ignore report of these kinds because it would affect their value.

Finall note the us government is useless and they do this for show to look cool in front of their voters. EU done more to these corporations.

There's a common thing parents do though where they don't notice the point they lose total control, or lose control totally.

It's almost impossible to keep kids from the internet, they can't stop prisoners getting phones in so what hope do parents have? How do you stop them using an account accessed by school computers, a secret second phone brought second hand or even worse brought for them by a creepy guy online. And if you block the services you know of it'll push them into ones you've never heard of, unmoderated and dangerous places.

And of course there's the dream of trust but none of us tell our parents everything, especially when we've already gone too far and are embarrassed we broke the trust.

If you as a kid are going to miss out on what feels like everything that's happening with your friends then you'll find a way. Or you'll get bullied at school by groups the form online and with online memes.

There needs to be safe places that kids can access social media, just saying they can't until they're a certain age won't work and if it did then it sets them up for a lot of issues on their first day.

A lot of it is down to parents to teach internet skills and awareness, it's also down to major platforms that target kids as a key audience to ensure there are effective systems in place to combat and avoid negative situations which might result in a child being harmed.

"we've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas!"

I think a lot of parents don't want to talk about what their children will encounter. Grooming, NSFW content, bullying, and misinformation.

Parents of the current generation usually had unrestricted Internet access if we had it at all, because our parents were Internet ignorant, on average. We can share those lessons.

Now I'm wondering. Is this a potential opportunity for the Fediverse?

Creating a walled in, heavily moderated social network for kids and teens.
Parents could be mods.
Would need some kind of age verification.
Maybe parents could setup accounts for themselves and their kids.

Just thinking this over as I type. I don't know.

I agree with almost everything but

It ain't rocket surgery

Got me thinking.

But I also think social networks could ban a lot more

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/TkYhCp64cPY?si=sVq3-llkzvPDqQib

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.