this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
220 points (94.0% liked)

Not The Onion

12344 readers
912 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ech@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The models used by the writers of the article and those used by the military are going to be radically different.

[–] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The writers of the article are reporting on use of these models by the military. They aren’t using the models. If I remember right they called out some models developed by one of the defense contractors like palantir

[–] ech@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The researchers tested LLMs such as OpenAI’s GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, Anthropic’s Claude 2 and Meta’s Llama 2

All these AIs are supported by Palantir’s commercial AI platform – though not necessarily part of Palantir’s US military partnership

Also, they're reporting on a Stanford study of how these platforms could be used militaristically, not the military's actual use of them.

[–] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You’re right. I was focused on this part above. I made like an AI and jumped the gun

These results come at a time when the US military has been testing such chatbots based on a type of AI called a large language model (LLM) to assist with military planning during simulated conflicts, enlisting the expertise of companies such as Palantir and Scale AI. Palantir declined to comment and Scale AI did not respond to requests for comment.