this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2025
42 points (56.6% liked)

Memes

54197 readers
2288 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Ukraine--the county literally being invaded by Russia--is an imperialist, war mongering tyrant? Get the fuck out of here with this slop. Could've just left it with the main flags, but throwing Ukraine's flag in there is legit braindead Chinese/Russian trolling.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 27 points 1 month ago

I laughed at seeing Finnish flag there. TORILLE

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago

If the US is running the show then yeah it's definitely imperialism, we've very clearly succeeded in mongering up a war there, and I do recall some pretty unambiguous reports of the current regime in Ukraine directly suppressing opposition parties and suspending elections

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ukraine isn’t imperialist; it’s a vassal of US empire.

[–] Ungraded@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How would you come to that conclusion?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 month ago

The west treats Ukraine like they do Israel. After the western-supported Euromaidan coup in 2014, they've armed millitant Banderites to crack down on communists and geopolitical adversaries of the west.

[–] LemmeAtEm@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Its government came to power as a result of a US-backed coup, for starters.

edit: For the record, I upvoted you because your question is fair and valid if you don't know the history and context of the situation. And the western media where many people understandably (if sadly) get their information from will never provide that history and context. That is why we get these confidently ignorant people coming into threads like this gobsmacked that anyone can deny what they see as the obvious truth of Russia's "unjustified invasion by a foreign aggressor."

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ukraine is a vassal of western imperialists, similar to Israel.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

So it makes it okay for a foreign country to invade them without just cause?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

There was just cause. The Kiev regime has killed 13,000 civilians in the Donbass region, and had amassed huge amounts of troops to retake the seperatist regions shortly before Russian intervention stopped the invasion.

[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Is eight years of ethnic cleansing, three broken treaties and potential nukes in the hands of a nazi junta not "just cause" enough for you?

[–] folaht@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No, it makes it okay for a foreign country to invade with just cause when there was...

  1. A coup
  2. The next election was won through the popularity of a tv series, where the election winner played president on tv. This was not a coincidence.
  3. It became very clear that the policies of these two presidents that it would completely isolate Ukraine from Russia, despite half of Ukraine being Russian and the other half semi-Russian.
  4. This upset parts of Ukraine that have deep economic ties with Russia so much, that they declared independence of Ukraine to join Russia, starting with Crimea.
  5. This in turn was painted by US/UK media as aggressive annexation by Putin.
  6. It also became clear that Zelensky wanted to join the EU at all costs.
  7. This concerned Russia as the EU doesn't seem to be independent of NATO policy and having nukes placed close to Russia's border aimed at Moscow in areas where xx% of the population would consider themselves Russian wanting to join Russia is considered a nightmare scenario for Russia if separatist conflict would be taking place there.
  8. Russia then made negotiations with Ukraine to address both concerns and Ukraine did not uphold their part of the agreement. This happened twice and in both cases this ended up with military victory for Russia and the separatist areas.
  9. Russia also negotiated with NATO, since NATO was supplying Ukraine with arms to end this conflict and it became clear that NATO and the EU were pushing Ukraine to further the conflict.
  10. At this point Russia decided that it was time to act before things would get further out of control, showing Ukraine's president that they were willing to wage war in order to prevent high otential nuclear conflict, by doing a small flash invasion, while preparing for world war III.
  11. Ukraine's president then flipped, saying he was willing to take the situation serious, but then flopped when UK's former prime minister came to visit him telling Zelensky that NATO was prepared to fully support Ukraine with whatever military equipment he needed.
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"How can they not be a Good Guy if they're fighting a Bad Guy!"

Liberals continue to get there politics from capeshit.

Chinese/Russian trolling.

Just openly admitting that you see all foreigners as interchangeable villains.

[–] msage@programming.dev -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Any open war is an absolute worst thing any country can do.

And by opening a conflict, it makes the other side automatically looking better. Irregardless of any history or precedens.

Specially if it drags for years. Just go back and let it be.

[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

An open war is absolutely not even close to the worst thing a country can do