this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
213 points (87.9% liked)

Technology

72769 readers
1886 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
213
Browser maker love-in snubs Google-shunned JPEG XL (www.theregister.com)
submitted 1 year ago by AnActOfCreation@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world
66 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
  • Browser makers Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Mozilla have announced Interop 2024, a project to promote web browser interoperability.
  • JPEG XL, a potential replacement for JPEG and PNG image formats, was not included in Interop 2024.
  • The rejection of JPEG XL has been blamed on Google, with the Google Chrome team deciding not to support the image compression technology.

Archive link: https://archive.ph/nulY6

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] verysoft@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

I expected Mozilla to implement this, I don't know how they expect to get marketshare by just following in Google's footsteps every step of the way.
Is Firefox it's own browser or just Chrome with a different engine? Even Apple support jxl, well the decoding anyway.

[–] soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because Mozilla really doesn't care about what people think anymore. They're an incredibly bureaucratic group dealing with a lot of red tape placed as a force for good that doesn't always meet the mark. It's mainly the reason Firefox doesn't have a lot of things (that it honestly should have)

Also, Firefox is a completely original browser but it doesn't have a "chromium" version the browser like Google Chrome does. Both of the Firefox commercial product and the source code compile to the same thing.

[–] verysoft@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know, it was a rhetorical question given the stance they take on a lot of things always aligning with what Google wants.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Hey friend, for what its worth when i read your question, i was very much channeling this Garth Algar

But with your question about it being its own browser

load more comments (5 replies)