On Digg there's some drama because someone registered the community “/wallstreetbets,” and the admins took it from him and gave it to one mod of the subreddit “r/wallstreetbets.”

One day later I see this discussion about how Reddit registered trademarks for some high-profile subreddits.

This could be relevant for the Threadiverse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Blaze@piefed.zip 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Comment from Nutomic as it seems you might have blocked him

This is an unreleased feature to federate some popular communities when a new Lemmy instance is created. It was hardcoded to lemmy.ml for a while, but I already changed this and made it configurable. Obviously the entire development code for Lemmy is not ready for production now, and needs a lot of fine-tuning. Its not an argument against the stable release version of Lemmy.

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/pull/6276

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nutomic is not in my blocklists - I may not agree with the devs philosophies but I do highly respect them nonetheless (I realize that may not always come across well), for offering their software as FOSS rather than keeping it private. I did block all users from lemmy.ml though, as the VAST majority of the time those comments just waste my time so while that throws out good replies sometimes, I find the balance highly worthwhile, personally. If it were possible to make an exemption to that, I would have done so specifically for Nutomic.

Anyway this is excellent news!! Sorta. It now being configurable, I will stop spreading this as misinformation, particularly against the lemmy.ml instance being authoritarian, and I thank you both for your correction in this matter.

That said, at a quick glance it does still look like the way to replace it is to use a different instance's community listing? (lemmy.world, lemmy.zip, whatever) Which is still a trend towards "centralization" - even if configurable now as to which source of bias the instance admins chooses?

I agree that it is entirely fair that Lemmy sourcecode development is slow (possibly the constraints of language choice, and/or funding concerns, etc.), and so Lemmy instance admins must make do with things that can be changed more readily while awaiting more difficult solutions to be implemented, with lower prioritization.

So overall still not an ideal situation, but I thank Nutomic and you for pointing out that it is a LOT better now than the earlier choice to hard-code lemmy.ml specifically into the codebase.

[–] Blaze@piefed.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That said, at a quick glance it does still look like the way to replace it is to use a different instance’s community listing? (lemmy.world, lemmy.zip, whatever) Which is still a trend towards “centralization” - even if configurable now as to which source of bias the instance admins chooses?

At some point, you have to refer to an existing instance.

Lemmy.today's blocklist is empty, that one could be used for people who want to avoid all bias.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I meant that choosing to implement the algorithm to refer to a singular instance is a step towards rather than away from "centralization". Other algorithms could be envisioned such as pulling from all instances that are federated with the newly created instance - although I don't know the ordering of steps so that specific solution may not be viable, so I only meant it as a (possibly very bad) illustration of such a concept that would implement a more decentralized ideal.

[–] Blaze@piefed.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Seems over complex to be honest. As long as the choice is configurable, it seems fine