this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
98 points (99.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

67352 readers
955 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 17 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

IMHO reaction videos should be illegal. Not because of the dmca but because they are annoying as f

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 16 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I don't mind the ones where a professional points out everything wrong with a show about their profession.

[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 3 points 12 hours ago

I am sure there are exceptions but from what I can tell about my limited time spent on YouTube there is far more things that are pointless regurgitating and content creation to have created content kinda videos out there. Ymmv

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 2 points 14 hours ago

I would filter the word "reaction" but I like chemistry videos. So instead, whenever I see a reaction video, I block the entire channel.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip -4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Replace “reaction videos” with “brown people” and you might understand why it’s a bad idea to outlaw annoyances

[–] armandoenlachamba@piefed.social 1 points 8 hours ago

What? How can you compare people to reaction videos?

And that thin-veiled message about "brown people" being an annoyance. . . . are you doing this on purpose?

I'm fascinated by this huuuge strawman.