this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
19 points (68.6% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Entropius@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (12 children)

LiDAR is essentially radar that uses light instead of sound

Radar doesn’t use sound. It sounds like the author doesn’t know the difference between sonar and radar.

[–] Ganondorf@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is why comments are so useful. I was already on the fence about viewing a site named futurism and your comment made sure I will avoid it moving forward.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think that's a big qualm of mine in terms of the sources allowed here, and I suppose it will take time to weed out the trustworthy from the not.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why does the word futurism put you the fence?

[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

A lot of articles that either use that buzzword or are published by sites that have that in their name are utter garbage. i.e rediculous predictions, inaccurate headlines/content etc.

[–] anlumo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Futurists are people who cosplay as scientists predicting stuff they have no clue about.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

11 months into the future, you will get a useless unfunny reply!

load more comments (9 replies)