this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
25 points (96.3% liked)
Fediverse
40406 readers
1286 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
@gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de haha i think that was a typo i meant normal dereferencing (which is admittedly already an annoying term of Semantic Web art that I only use to help people bashing their head against these specs for the first time). plainly speaking, a "web-based DID" (any of the did:web successors linked above) gives you rules for translating, e.g.,
did:webvh:bumblefudge.com:1234intohttps://bumblefudge.com/1234/.well-known/did.json-- you can just make that second string into theidproperty of an actor, and put a normal AP actor object in the file you get back at that URL and for the AP world (that doesn't have to know or care what a DID is) that's just... an Actor. The controller of that Actor can use the the first string in DID-based system, if those ever exist at scale. To date, the only pertinent place you can use a DID but not an Actor ID is in... an At Protocol URI, i.e.at://did:webvh:1234/lexicon/recordkey(sidenote, yes, those colons are invalid, dropping thedid:and inverting the rest of the authority to1234:didwebvhwould be a more conformant URI)Anyways, hope that's helpful to whatever research and/or design you're doing, I've probably ranted enough for one thread :sweat_smile: