Selfhosted
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
-
No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
view the rest of the comments
What do you mean by this? Closing unused ports?
I'm using RouterOS. In the firewall rules you can create a rule that if an IP touches a port, it get added to a address list (optional with a time-out). So my FW rules begin like this:
So using a portscanner will touch ports I'm not running any service on (like telnet) and you'll be blocked. A time-out of one week on the blacklist usually gives me an blacklist of 6500+ addresses.
This too has endless possibilities. t.ex. like port knocking. ('touch' one or more ports in a specified sequence in a specified time to be allowed to access the actual service port)
Off-topic: Looks like you missed the two spaces after beginning a new line.
Just wanted to inform you in case you werent aware ;)
the spacebar on my Remington isn't what it used to be, maybe a drop of oil will help ;)
This is a waste of time and your router's CPU. You already have a whitelist and know your safe TCP sources, just drop all wan traffic and only allow new input from whitelist. Your chain input rule is just creating a pretty list of bots you're dropping anyway.
Well, here is the CPU load:
And there is no increase on delay's or jitter compared to what i'm already facing on the WAN itself.
It keep's 6000+ hosts with possible harmful intend away from the ports I need/want open to the world. Actually, the router -while still being bored- offloads the services behind it. I really can't see a reason not to keep doing it. But, sure, it's a personal choice.
Delays? Jitter? What are you talking about?
Didn't you say you have whitelist of allowed ips? Why don't you just drop any other inbound traffic?
Not exactly.
So all IP's are allowed to begin with, but some ("my" IP's like at home, my office etc) are on a whitelist ahead of everything else. They can't become blacklisted to avoid myself becoming locked out. Then it's the drop all on the blacklisted, followed by portscan detection. Only after that the 'normal' rules (allow https, smtp etc) begin.