this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
218 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

83295 readers
3622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (22 children)

Let's just cut the shit and admit that over-the-air broadcast television is effectively dead.

This is why Net Neutrality mattered, because the future isn't in old tech (radio broadcast) being consumed by DRM in desperate plays to stay relevant and/or profitable.

The future was always in things like YouTube, Netflix, and other online content delivery services. Which is why strict regulation of Net Neutrality and strict regulation of such services was and continues to be so important.

No, the infrastructure isn't "open" like broadcast airwaves, which technically anyone with a license and equipment can jump into using, whereas internet infrastructure is all privately owned wired networking. The fact that it is different isn't an excuse for any and all governments to have just effectively given up on regulation of those spaces when they're where the media-consuming public happen to be. That's why we needed legislation of these things instead of a back and forth wankery of the FCC changing how the internet is classified over and over again in between warring political factions.

I can almost guarantee you that nobody under the age of 30 gives a singly flying fuck about having an antenna on a television. They're probably watching more than half their media on their phone or tablet anyway.

The real reason that this kind of change is happening to over-the-air broadcasting is because it doesn't have enough viewers, and by extension, enough advertising, to sustain it as a model anymore.

I think the loss of over-the-air programming isn't the best thing, but I also think it's stupid to keep holding on to this idea like it matters very much in 2026 where if you asked a kid in their twenties if they even knew what an antenna for a television was they'd probably go "what the fuck are you even talking about?"

But I mean we can't even regulate shit like paid political speech online needing to say that it is paid political speech, so fat chance of any useful legislation coming anytime soon. US government in particular has been broken as fuck for three decades.

[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

While you're probably right about the younger generation, there's currently a huge movement away from cable and a million online streaming services and back to OTA. It's why the antenna I bought 15 yrs ago now costs 5x what it did then.

My wife and I dropped cable 13yrs ago now and between the OTA, free streaming like Twitch and YouTube, and such, and buying physical BluRays we haven't missed it.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I live 70 miles from my nearest broadcast. I invested in a nice antenna and an HDHomerun years ago.

Otherwise we’re beholden to $60+ a month for the basic cable package to watch any sports or local news.

Screw that.

load more comments (20 replies)