this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
883 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

81907 readers
5040 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hacker News.

Author blog about that.

AI generated quotes in a story about AI clanker writing a blog post about a human developer because they didn't accept their code contributions.

How deep can someone go here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] morto@piefed.social 57 points 1 week ago (15 children)

It would be nice if he decides to sue ars technica for that. Writers and publisher need to learn the hard way that you can't use ai and trust that for publishing stuff that needs factual coherence. If not by ethics, let it be from fear of lawsuits.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Sue them for what? He would have to prove damages and they took it down.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (11 children)

Libel. Taking it down doesn’t undo the damage to reputation which libel is concerned with. They might not get any monetary damages awarded but could maybe force Ars to put out a retraction.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As much as I would like to see that happen paying to fight a court case against Conde Nast just to get a retraction that they will stick somewhere invisible doesn't really sound like a winning formula.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Letting them win because you’ve conceded before even playing is also a losing formula. Even if they don’t get awarded monetary damages they can probably at least get their legal expenses covered.

[–] jve@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They pulled the article. What more are you hoping for?

[–] xvapx@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

could maybe force Ars to put out a retraction

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)