this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
69 points (90.6% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
3366 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
69
[On the lighter side] Billionaire suggests a payload would have solved Starship explosion due to venting oxygen. And we have a suggestion for who that payload could be (www.theregister.com)
submitted 9 months ago by Squire1039@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Summary

  • Elon Musk claims the fiery end of Starship's 2nd flight was due to venting liquid oxygen without a payload.
  • He suggests a payload would have consumed the oxygen, preventing the fire and explosion.
  • The writer questions the "venting causing fire" logic and highlights SpaceX's iterative learning approach.
  • Despite the explosion, SpaceX considers the launch a success due to technical achievements.
  • Next launch planned soon, aiming for orbit and other ambitious goals.
  • NASA's Artemis program delays offer SpaceX potentially helpful extra time.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 9 months ago

SO. AGILE.