this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
406 points (97.7% liked)

Not The Onion

20596 readers
2177 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (33 children)

Contrails are mostly water vapour that's condensed due to the hot exhaust of airplane engines.

They are certainly not completely avoidable, they are likely inescapable without sacrificing significant fuel efficiencies (eg: all methods stealth fighters use to suppress or mask their exhaust heat signature).. which would negate any benefits to global warming.

P. s. I'm not going to watch a YouTube video that could be a few paragraphs of textual explanation, because it'll no doubt be eight times longer than it needs to be for the benefit of more ad money or promotion in the almighty algorithm.

[–] ClassyHatter@sopuli.xyz -5 points 1 week ago (12 children)

That YouTube Short seems to be a valid one. It's by someone who (according to his own words) has a PhD in atmospheric physics. Basically, he says that contrails causes global warming by preventing heat from escaping from Earth, and that contrails are mostly only formed when a plane flies through a cold humid patch. By simply re-routing planes around these cold patches, the contrails could be reduced.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wouldn't rerouting be more fuel-intensive in most scenarios, though? I feel like burning more fuel to make fewer clouds isn't the right play.

[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It would require a slight increase in fuel consumption, traded off with a large decrease in heating caused by the water vapour.

Seriously, you should watch the video, it covers all of this stuff.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)