this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
331 points (98.0% liked)

Not The Onion

20473 readers
564 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago

So we banned ...water vapor. Well done, house committee.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Please pass this bill, that'd be so hilarious, the US inadvertently closing it's airspace semi permanently because they're such dumbasses

Alabama not the US house. That headline needs a lot of context

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Whoopee. Now the fucking fringers have become the mainstream.

[–] kurmudgeon@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago

This is what the decline in education and humility gets you in America.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

The chemtrails aren't a thing, but in the legislators small mind, who would be behind them? Are they actually thinking that there's some private individual that is spending billions building a secret massive network of bribed pilots and bribed mechanics that are spraying such chemicals to change the weather or influence the people in some ways?

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 31 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Should be easy for the airlines to comply with, since they don't leave chemtrails, they leave contrails.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

That sounds like something someone with a degree in ozone would say!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I don't believe you. Begin firing on my signal.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Why ban them? What's in them?

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

And the 5Gs

[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The sad thing is that there is a huge amount that could be done for global warming with some basic legislation around contrails. Clouds that high in the atmosphere are quite bad in terms of greenhouse effect. By avoiding flying through areas that they'd be generated there's a surprisingly large environmental benefit for minimal cost. A good explainer: https://youtu.be/QoOVqQ5sa08

[–] Pirat@lemmy.org 11 points 9 hours ago

I never thought it about as a green house thing before though I do remember reading an article many years ago that contrails do contribute when they spread out into cirrostratus clouds.

I was a meteorologist in the Air Force and did make forecasts telling pilots at what levels to fly to avoid making contrails since having a long silver line pointing to your exact location makes sneak attacks a little difficult. Perhaps commercial airlines should make use of that information. It's usually just a few thousand foot difference. Fly a little higher or lower and problem solved.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 38 points 18 hours ago

Alabama State House. Not the U.S. House.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 46 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

We live in the stupidest timeline.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 23 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Red State voters living in abject poverty: "Republicans is gittin important stuff done!"

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

10 Years After SCOTUS Gutted Voting Rights Act, Alabama Turnout Gap Is Worse

Apart from 2018, the white-Black turnout gap increased each year from 2012 through 2022. During last year’s election, the white-Black gap was 9 points — triple the size of the gap only a decade ago. Put differently, some 90,000 more Black voters would have participated in Alabama last year if Black turnout had reached parity with white turnout. The white-nonwhite turnout gap remained at 13 percentage points, the same as in 2020 — translating to roughly 150,000 ballots uncast by people of color.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 62 points 22 hours ago (6 children)
[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 33 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

3-4 decades of purposefully undermining public education

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 21 points 19 hours ago

More like 5-7 decades.. "anti-nerd" culture has been popular since about the 50's

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 51 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Republicans are in control

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Pirat@lemmy.org 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Well, it's impossible to ban natural clouds but planes could avoid making contrails by just not flying in the zone where their exhaust would cause them. Source: I was a weatherman in the Air Force and would tell military pilots where to fly to not have a shiny line pointing to their exact location if such information could be a concern.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Well that could be problematic.

So I’m curious now… what conditions cause the contrails? Certain temps, humidity, wind speed? I would think very humid cold air but that’s just a guess.

[–] Pirat@lemmy.org 3 points 6 hours ago

In answer to your question: yes. Humid cold pure air. By pure, I mean no contaminates until the hyrdrocarbons from the jet fuel are emitted into that pure, moist air. To form a droplet, a nucleus is needed. The hydrocarbons of the jet engine exhaust provide that nuclueus.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 0x0f@piefed.social 141 points 1 day ago (51 children)

Should be easy, considering they don't exist to begin with. 

load more comments (51 replies)
[–] pleaseletmein@lemmy.zip 14 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

No more air travel, I guess?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rimu@piefed.social 57 points 1 day ago (8 children)

How do you think the conspiracy nuts will react if this bill becomes law and then there are just as many contrails in the sky as before?

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Considering how stupid those who want this are, they'll just go oh see, they stopped doing chemicals in the trails now!. Or 50/50 chance want all jet planes banned 🤷

Accurate representation of those wanting this

[–] rimu@piefed.social 3 points 8 hours ago

Sadly they'll just think it's the federal govt doing the spraying that's why they ignore state laws.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›