this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

12390 readers
767 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Marijuana legalization is linked to significantly better recruitment for college basketball and worse outcomes for football teams, according to a new study. Researchers at Georgia College & State University and Kennesaw State University said there are numerous factors that affect recruitment trends in college athletic leagues, and so they tested the relationship between adult-use cannabis […]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Fancy that, when you stop arresting kids for having a plant in their pocket more of them tend to go to college and more of them will sign up for basketball scholarships

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But terrifies people looking for football scholarships?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

Yeah, that part is weird. Maybe it's the brain damage talking? 🤷

[–] runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's not what the report is suggesting. It's suggesting that talented basketball players are more likely to go to a school in a state with legal weed.

That the feds really need to deschedule weed.

[–] Crowfiend@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

So what you're saying is that, if given a choice between being barred/denied entry over pot use, people will instead just go to places that allow it?

Not sure I'm seeing the difference between your point and OPs comment.